Google Translate Widget by
Infofru
Author Site
Reviewresults
Sidebar
×
Buscar...
GIGAPP
Grupo de Investigación en Gobierno, Administración y Políticas Públicas
Usted está aquí:
Inicio
Congresos
Congreso 2017
Grupos Trabajo 2017
Publicaciones/Documentos
legitimation-and-policy-dynamics-approach-for-the-study-of-policy-change-a-proposal
home
Nosotros
Misión y visión
Convenios
Únete y participa
Noticias
Comunidad
Consejo Académico
Nuestra comunidad
Equipo Humano
Entidades amigas
Grupos de Trabajo
Equipo Editorial
free joomla extensions
joomla template 3
Dr. José A.Hernández
Dr. César N.Cruz-Rubio
Dra. Cecilia Güemes
Dra. Palmira Chavero
D. Álvaro Ramírez-Alujas
Publicaciones
Destacadas
Catálogo
Working Papers
BLOG-Luces del Sur
Revistas Amigas
publicaciones (lista tabla)
Congresos
Congreso 2022
I Semana Virtual 2021
Congreso 2019
Grupos Trabajo 2019
Fotos 2019
Conmemorativos XGIGAPP
Congreso 2018
Grupos Trabajo 2018
Fotos 2018
Congreso 2017
Grupos Trabajo 2017
Fotos 2017
Congreso 2016
Grupos Trabajo 2016
Fotos 2016
Congreso 2015
Grupos Trabajo 2015
Fotos 2015
Congreso 2014
Fotos 2014
Congreso 2013
Fotos 2013
GIGAPP Edu
Ultimos recursos GIGAPP Edu
Leer más...
Leer más...
Videos
YOU MUST ENABLED JS
Legitimation and Policy Dynamics Approach for the Study of Policy Change: A Proposal.
Cruz-Rubio, César Nicandro
Abstract:
Based on policy change literature and in an improved version of D. Beetham's (1991) model for legitimacy (Alagappa, 1994), I propose here an approach for the study of policy stability & change (called legitimation & policy dynamics). Oriented to explain policy change in political systems defined by its institutional fragility and persistent legitimacy deficits, LPD is an actor-centered perspective, in which legitimation of power through policy is assumed as an unavoidable task, and conforms as a causal-driver useful in explaining policy stability and change. LPD assumes that policy change can take two forms: as a reactive way or as a proactive logic. In both of these forms the actors of the dominant coalition will seek to maintain an active presence (and increase own’s influence and control capabilities if possible) over policy and its change processes. Institutionally conditioned, these actors may assume four differentiated operational positions (shock response, strategic improvement-based, thermostatic and change-contention) and in doing so they also configure narratives and send clear messages that influence all actor expectations during change process. The “legitimacy pattern” associated with a given policy design favors periods of stability based on perpetuation, the logic of adaptation and incremental changes or planned and long-time based processes of policy change. Focusing events, external shocks, innovation and diffusion processes, or endogenous dynamics are all forces that influence the policy subsystem and may lead to distortions (based on unconformity with rules, discrepancy with shared beliefs, withdrawal of consent or an inadequate policy performance) in the legitimacy pattern. Those distortions may force changes in the dominant coalition and in public policy, but it is only with a transformation of the legitimacy pattern when a major policy change occurs. Preliminary hypotheses are here proposed.
Área(s) temática(s):
3. Políticas Públicas
Año:
2012
Tipo de publicación:
Artículo
Palabras clave:
Policy Process, Policy Change, Legitimation
Journal:
Paper for delivery at the XXII World Congress of Political Science. IPSA-AISP
Páginas:
30
Mes:
8 to 12 July, 2012.
Cruz-Rubio 2012 for IPSA.pdf
Versión digital
Hits: 17334
Back
empty
YOU MUST ENABLED JS